Charge
The charge of the Research Committee is to enable
research support for assigned goals of the standing
committees, to assess project requests, and
to work with committee chairs to link them to
available and project-appropriate researchers
screened by the committee. The State Academic
Senate's Research Committee is dedicated to
supporting faculty research efforts in areas
such as accreditation and program review.
Membership
The committee is not currently meeting.
Meetings
The committee is not currently meeting.
2003-2004
Goals
Develop a primer and resource pool for colleges
to use with reference to accreditation. This
goal will be completed in time for the Spring
Plenary. The committee is busily collecting
data and statements from researchers and participants
in the accreditation process, among others (2.08
F02, 2.14 F02).
Committee members are to collect materials for
consideration at future meetings (links, papers,
bibliographies, resources) for placement on
the Research Committee link to the ASCCC.
Urge community colleges to refrain from offering
speech communication classes of three or more
semester units in time segments of fewer than
six weeks, except with the consent of the local
speech communication faculty and academic senate.
(9.05R S02) **
This goal is being blended with the larger and
more general consideration of abbreviated courses,
alternative delivery time frames (9.06R S02
Quality of Instruction) and a need for specific
research with reference to abbreviated course
formats, rigor, attrition, and grade distribution.
Urge community colleges
to refrain from offering any courses of three
or more semester units in any alternative delivery
time frames other than full-term except with
the consent of the tenured discipline faculty
and the curriculum committee. (9.06R S02) **
The Committee is discussing
the need to gather information regarding local
practice, including the prevalence of abbreviated
courses, time frames, subject areas, retention
rates, and concerns for rigor prior to crafting
a statement for consideration by Exec. This
work is ongoing and of a high priority.
** The two above-listed goals may be combined,
pending availability of research,
and result in the creation of a paper regarding
non-traditional modes of
instruction.
Develop a paper on
the outcomes/assessment movement. Research Committee
will collaborate with Ed Policies Committee
and President. Emphasize that current use and
nature of data is often not effective and its
effect on educational policy is often counterproductive
(2.08 F02)
Research is being collected, sorted, and prepared
to place on the Committee's ASCCC website link
as a resource.
Work with Basic Skills
Committee on a survey of assessment and placement.
This follows on recommendations 2.c, 2.d, and
2.g in the paper, "A Survey of Effective
Practices in Basic Skills," adopted Spring
2003.
It is possible that this information may exist
at the Chancellor's office, but we may require
someone to extrapolate and summarize the information.
The possibility of a grant is being considered.
Jerry Rudmann has sent an email to Harriet Robles
to put the committee's discussion of research
about basic skills assessment on the RP Board
agenda. That group will be meeting at Irvine
Valley on October 17th
Boards and Hiring. Work with collective bargaining
and other organization colleagues to seek legislation
and/or regulation changes requiring that, when
a local governing board fails to hire a faculty
member recommended by the screening committee
and CEO, the Board give to the hiring committee
reasons for not hiring there commended individual
(1.07R S99).
This goal is based on a four- year old resolution.
The intention of this resolution was communicated
to our CoFO partners for their suggestions and
advice; thus, the Research Committee will write
a letter for the ASCCC officers to carry to
CoFO.
Goals
not carried over:
Degree Audit Check. Urge local academic senates
to support the adoption at their colleges of
an automatic degree audit check when a student
completes 45 units, and to support the use of
a motivational letter automatically generated
through their Management Information Systems
(MIS) to students completing 45degree applicable
units which includes a list of courses needed
to complete their Associate degree. (8.01 RS99).
Recommend referral to CLFIC
for final disposition.
FW Grading. Resolved that the Academic Senate
postpone forwarding the FW grade proposal to
the Board of Governors until the effect of the
FW grade on financial aid is clarified, and
Resolved that Academic Senate reaffirm its support
of open access to California community colleges
thus giving students the opportunity for economic
and social success (14.01R S00). Completed.
High School Courses. Reaffirm the missions
of community colleges, as established by the
Education Code, and take the position that the
missions of the community colleges do not include
the development of high school curricula or
the employment of high school teachers (1904R
S00). Recommend this goal
be passed to Curriculum for final disposition.
Business Education Statewide Advisory Committee.
That the Academic Senate reaffirm its support
for the Business Education Statewide Advisory
Committee and recognize the Committee's crucial
role in the development and support for business
and technical educators in their workforce training
efforts, and continue funding for the Business
Education Statewide Advisory Committee in its
partnership efforts with the business community
to provide relevant, effective, and accessible
business training and educational opportunities
for all Californians (21.05 RS00). Completed.
Faculty Evaluation of Management. Urge local
academic senates to seek implementation of AB1725
in the evaluation of management by including
input from all supervised faculty in the periodic
evaluations of all academic administrators (17.04
S02).
Completed. A breakout was held and a lengthy
article was published in the "Rostrum."
An initial survey was conducted, though the
response indicated few faculty knew at the time
of their statutory or regulatory right to participate
in such evaluations.
2003 Fall Goals
1. Encourage local senates to
work in cooperation with local bargaining units
to create security barriers between collected
data and individual instructors, students, and
class sections; encourage local senates to employ
methodologies that aggregate Student Learning
Outcomes data; and stress adherence to the 1974
Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy
Act, as well as statements on academic freedom
and privacy adopted by the Academic Senate and
the American Association of University Professors
(2.01 F03).
2. Recommend that colleges and
districts provide adequate institutional support
for any faculty-driven process that coordinates,
manages, and integrates Student Learning Outcomes
(2.02 F03).
3. Work with the Chancellor's
Office to study the impact that existing and proposed
fees have on access of various groups of students
(including under-represented populations, transfer-oriented
students, vocational students, returning students,
and those seeking improvement in basic skills);
report these findings at a future plenary session
in the form of a breakout session and/or a position
paper (6.01 F03).
4. Research the numbers of necessary
programs, types of programs, and reasons why programs
have been reduced/discontinued and publish this
information; utilize the research findings to
provide information to legislators to help promote
increased funding to necessary community college
programs; and reaffirm position that program review
and program discontinuance be separate processes
and urge local senates to actively participate
in both processes (9.04 F03).
5. Research the feasibility,
advantages, and disadvantages of implementing
common statewide assessment tests for math, English,
reading, and ESL for the purpose of placement
and report back to the plenary body at the Spring
2005 Plenary Session (13.01 F03).