Counselor Survey-Frequency Breakdown for Each Survey Item

How long have you been advising transfer students at the community college level?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	1 yr	17	5.0	5.1	5.1
	2 to 5 yrs	57	16.7	17.2	22.3
	5+ yrs	258	75.7	77.7	100.0
	Total	332	97.4	100.0
Missing		9	2.6
Total		341	100.0

At which community college are you employed as a counselor?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	American River College	7	2.1	2.1	2.1
	Antelope Valley College	1	.3	.3	2.3
	Bakersfield College	3	.9	.9	3.2
	Barstow College	1	.3	.3	3.5
	Butte College	3	.9	.9	4.4
	Cabrillo College	3	.9	.9	5.3
	Canada College	4	1.2	1.2	6.5
	Cerritos College	5	1.5	1.5	7.9
	Chabot College	10	2.9	2.9	10.9
	Chaffey College	1	.3	.3	11.1
	Citrus College	4	1.2	1.2	12.3
	City College of San Francisco	3	.9	.9	13.2
	Coastline Community College	2	.6	.6	13.8
	College of Marin	1	.3	.3	14.1
	College of San Mateo	12	3.5	3.5	17.6
	College Of The Canyons	4	1.2	1.2	18.8
	College of the Desert	3	.9	.9	19.6
	College of the Sequoias	4	1.2	1.2	20.8
	College of the Siskiyous	3	.9	.9	21.7
	Columbia College	5	1.5	1.5	23.2
	Cosumnes River College	1	.3	.3	23.5
	Cuesta College	9	2.6	2.6	26.1
	Cuyamaca College	1	.3	.3	26.4
	Cypress College	2	.6	.6	27.0
	DeAnza College	11	3.2	3.2	30.2
	Diablo Valley College	12	3.5	3.5	33.7
	East Los Angeles College	1	.3	.3	34.0
	El Camino College	6	1.8	1.8	35.8
	Evergreen Valley College	5	1.5	1.5	37.2
	Foothill College	4	1.2	1.2	38.4
	Fullerton College	2	.6	.6	39.0
	Gavilan College	5	1.5	1.5	40.5
	GlendaleCommunity College	1	.3	.3	40.8
	Golden West College	5	1.5	1.5	42.2
	Grossmont College	10	2.9	2.9	45.2
	Irvine Valley College	6	1.8	1.8	46.9
	Lake Tahoe Community College	1	.3	.3	47.2
	Las Positas College	4	1.2	1.2	48.4
	Lassen College	1	.3	.3	48.7
	Long Beach City College	10	2.9	2.9	51.6
	Los Angeles Trade-TechCollege	1	.3	.3	51.9
	Los Angeles Valley College	2	.6	.6	52.5
	Los Medanos College	4	1.2	1.2	53.7
	Merritt College	2	.6	.6	54.3
	MiraCosta College	5	1.5	1.5	55.7
	Mission College	2	.6	.6	56.3
	Modesto Junior College	1	.3	.3	56.6
	Monterey Peninsula College	8	2.3	2.3	58.9
	Moorpark College	4	1.2	1.2	60.1
	Mt. San Antonio College	2	.6	.6	60.7
	Mt. San Jacinto College	1	.3	.3	61.0
	Napa Valley College	7	2.1	2.1	63.0
	Ohlone College	7	2.1	2.1	65.1
	Oxnard College	1	.3	.3	65.4
	Palo Verde College	2	.6	.6	66.0
	Palomar College	12	3.5	3.5	69.5
	PortervilleCollege	2	.6	.6	70.1
	Rio Hondo College	4	1.2	1.2	71.3
	Riverside Community College	8	2.3	2.3	73.6
	Sacramento City College	3	.9	.9	74.5
	Saddleback College	8	2.3	2.3	76.8
	San Bernardino Valley College	2	.6	.6	77.4
	San Diego City College	2	.6	.6	78.0
	San Diego Mesa College	3	.9	.9	78.9
San Diego Miramar College	2	.6	.6	79.5
San Jose City College	7	2.1	2.1	81.5
Santa Ana College	3	.9	.9	82.4
Santa Barbara City College	7	2.1	2.1	84.5
Santa Monica College	18	5.3	5.3	89.7
Santa Rosa Junior College	6	1.8	1.8	91.5
Shasta College	4	1.2	1.2	92.7
Sierra College	1	.3	.3	93.0
Solano Community College	2	.6	.6	93.5
Southwestern College	7	2.1	2.1	95.6
Taft College	1	.3	.3	95.9
Victor Valley College	1	.3	.3	96.2
Vista College	2	.6	.6	96.8
West Hills College	1	.3	.3	97.1
West Los Angeles College	1	.3	.3	97.4
West Valley College	6	1.8	1.8	99.1
Yuba College	3	.9	.9	100.0
Total	341	100.0	100.0

To which UC campus do most of your UC-bound students transfer?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	UC Berkeley	59	17.3	17.3	17.3
	UC Davis	90	26.4	26.4	43.7
	UC Irvine	34	10.0	10.0	53.7
	UC Los Angeles	53	15.5	15.5	69.2
	UC Riverside	23	6.7	6.7	76.0
	UC San Diego	43	12.6	12.6	88.6
	UC Santa Barbara	20	5.9	5.9	94.4
	UC Santa Cruz	19	5.6	5.6	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

To which CSU campus do most of your CSU-bound students transfer?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	CSU Bakersfield	9	2.6	2.6	2.6
	CSU Chico	12	3.5	3.5	6.2
	CSU Dominguez Hills	6	1.8	1.8	7.9
	CSU Fresno	5	1.5	1.5	9.4
	CSU Fullerton	22	6.5	6.5	15.8
	CSU Hayward	37	10.9	10.9	26.7
	CSU Humboldt	1	.3	.3	27.0
	CSU Long Beach	25	7.3	7.3	34.3
	CSU Los Angeles	4	1.2	1.2	35.5
	CSU Monterey Bay	6	1.8	1.8	37.2
	CSU Northridge	34	10.0	10.0	47.2
	CSU Pomona	6	1.8	1.8	49.0
	CSU Sacramento	14	4.1	4.1	53.1
	CSU San Bernardino	19	5.6	5.6	58.7
	CSU San Diego	30	8.8	8.8	67.4
	CSU San Francisco	16	4.7	4.7	72.1
	CSU San Jose	53	15.5	15.5	87.7
	CSU San Luis Obispo	11	3.2	3.2	90.9
	CSU San Marcos	12	3.5	3.5	94.4
	CSU Sonoma	13	3.8	3.8	98.2
	CSU Stanislaus	6	1.8	1.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Of the number of students you counsel, what percentage consists of transfer students?
	Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
10 to 40%	70	20.5	20.5	20.5
40 to 70%	166	48.7	48.7	69.2
less 10%	15	4.4	4.4	73.6
plus 70%	90	26.4	26.4	100.0
Total	341	100.0	100.0

How informed are you about the IGETC general education option for transfer students?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Reasonably informed	73	21.4	21.5	21.5
	Uninformed	1	.3	.3	21.8
	Only vaguely informed	4	1.2	1.2	22.9
	Very informed	262	76.8	77.1	100.0
	Total	340	99.7	100.0
Missing	System	1	.3
Total		341	100.0

Do you recommend the IGETC option as a preferred choice to transfer students who can meet their objectives by a variety of general education patterns?
	Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
No Answer	10	2.9	2.9	2.9
No, not most of the time	125	36.7	36.7	39.6
Yes, most of the time	206	60.4	60.4	100.0
Total	341	100.0	100.0

Recommend IGETC to students intending to transfer only to a UC campus.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	92	27.0	27.0	27.0
	yes	249	73.0	73.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Recommend IGETC to students intending to transfer only to a CSU campus.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	332	97.4	97.4	97.4
	yes	9	2.6	2.6	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Recommend IGETC to students intending to transfer either to UC or CSU.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	51	15.0	15.0	15.0
	yes	290	85.0	85.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Recommend IGETC to students intending to transfer neither to UC nor CSU.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	287	84.2	84.2	84.2
	yes	54	15.8	15.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Recommend IGETC to students undecided as to where they will transfer.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	86	25.2	25.2	25.2
	yes	255	74.8	74.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Do you consider a student's GPA or other measures of academic potential when deciding whether to recommend the IGETC pattern for lower-division, general education course work?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Yes, I give it careful consideration	99	29.0	29.1	29.1
	No, I give it no consideration	66	19.4	19.4	48.5
	Yes, but not significantly	174	51.0	51.2	99.7
	I only recommend IGETC to high achievers	1	.3	.3	100.0
	Total	340	99.7	100.0
Missing	System	1	.3
Total		341	100.0

Do you consider a student's choice of major when deciding to recommend the IGETC pattern for lower-division, general education course work?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Yes, I give it careful consideration	228	66.9	67.5	67.5
	I only recommend IGETC to Ss w/certain majors, never others	60	17.6	17.8	85.2
	No, I give it no consideration	11	3.2	3.3	88.5
	Yes, but not significantly	39	11.4	11.5	100.0
	Total	338	99.1	100.0
Missing	System	3	.9
Total		341	100.0

Acquired familiarity with IGETC by reading "IGETC Notes"
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	99	29.0	29.0	29.0
	yes	242	71.0	71.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired familiarity with IGETC by training sessions run by UC
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	116	34.0	34.0	34.0
	yes	225	66.0	66.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired familiarity with IGETC by training sessions run by CSU
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	216	63.3	63.3	63.3
	yes	125	36.7	36.7	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired familiarity with IGETC by training sessions run by CCC
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	220	64.5	64.5	64.5
	yes	121	35.5	35.5	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through local colleagues
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	116	34.0	34.0	34.0
	yes	225	66.0	66.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through college and/or district administrators
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	294	86.2	86.2	86.2
	yes	47	13.8	13.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through participation in the local curriculum process
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	264	77.4	77.4	77.4
	yes	77	22.6	22.6	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through the local and/or statewide academic senate
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	319	93.5	93.5	93.5
	yes	22	6.5	6.5	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through "Ensuring Transfer Success" workshops
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	126	37.0	37.0	37.0
	yes	215	63.0	63.0	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Acquired IGETC familiarity through college catalogs
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	198	58.1	58.1	58.1
	yes	143	41.9	41.9	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

What percentage of your college's transfer students would you estimate is sufficiently aware of the IGETC GE requirement to consider this pattern among available choices?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	About half	123	36.1	36.8	36.8
	About one-third	118	34.6	35.3	72.2
	About two-thirds	93	27.3	27.8	100.0
	Total	334	97.9	100.0
Missing	System	7	2.1
Total		341	100.0

IGETC should become the single and only statewide pattern for meeting lower-division general education requirements for CCC students transferring to CSU/UC.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	280	82.1	82.1	82.1
	yes	61	17.9	17.9	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

IGETC minimum competency requirements in mathematics should be lowered.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	305	89.4	89.4	89.4
	yes	36	10.6	10.6	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

The total number of general education units in the IGETC pattern should be reduced.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	328	96.2	96.2	96.2
	yes	13	3.8	3.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Students should be able to substitute some course work in the CSU-GE certification list for IGETC requirements, even though those options are not currently provided within IGETC.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	192	56.3	56.3	56.3
	yes	149	43.7	43.7	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

CSU students should be allowed to double count courses where appropriate.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	161	47.2	47.2	47.2
	yes	180	52.8	52.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Flexibility in certification should be allowed.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	195	57.2	57.2	57.2
	yes	146	42.8	42.8	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

A minimum course grade should not be specified for IGETC.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	323	94.7	94.7	94.7
	yes	18	5.3	5.3	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

UC campuses should eliminate campus-specific GE requirements and certify only with IGETC.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	159	46.6	46.6	46.6
	yes	182	53.4	53.4	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

**IGETC should allow more flexibility in categories and/or choice of courses to fulfill requirements within categories.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	188	55.1	55.1	55.1
	yes	153	44.9	44.9	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Revision to the current pattern is unnecessary and undersirable.
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	301	88.3	88.3	88.3
	yes	40	11.7	11.7	100.0
	Total	341	100.0	100.0

Do you recommend the IGETC option as a preferred choice to transfer students who can meet their objectives by a variety of general education patterns?
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	no	125	36.7	37.8	37.8
	yes	206	60.4	62.2	100.0
	Total	331	97.1	100.0
Missing	System	10	2.9
Total		341	100.0