AbstractAn
Integrated Approach to Multicultural Education In
this paper we provide concrete ideas on how you
can implement change in your course or program
to incorporate content and techniques that support
multicultural education. It defines multicultural
education in the community college environment
with an emphasis on student learning styles. An
instrument for analyzing and implementing curricular
change is provided in addition to curricular application
examples, a glossary and a student learning style
assessment instrument.
This
paper was developed jointly by the Educational
Policies Committee and the
Affirmative Action/Cultural Diversity Committee,
1991-1995.
Winston
Butler Los Angeles City College AA/CD
Loretta Canett-Bailes Compton College Ed. Policies
Edith Conn Ventura College AA/CD & Ed. Policies
Sally Flotho Golden West College AA/CD & Ed.
Policies
Candice Francis Palomar College AA/CD
Joe D. Hernandez Chaffey College AA/CD
Annjennette McFarlin Grossmont College AA/CD
Ceci Medina Cerritos College AA/CD
Dwight Lomayesva Riverside City College AA/CD
& Ed. Policies
Gloria Romero Chaffey College Ed. Policies
Virginia Romero Cerritos College AA/CD
Maxine Sherard San Diego City College AA/CD
Beverly Shue Los Angeles Harbor College Ed. Policies
& AA/CD
Regina Stanback-Stroud Rancho Santiago College
AA/CD
Michael Widener Compton College Ed. Policies
An Integrated Approach
to Multicultural Education
INTRODUCTION
Multicultural
education is an approach to teaching and learning
that seeks to empower individuals so that they
may function in a global society. It is based
upon democratic values and beliefs. It seeks to
foster cultural pluralism within culturally diverse
societies and an interdependent world. The Academic
Senate for California Community Colleges recommends
these suggestions to engage faculty in meeting
the educational needs of our diverse student population.
This paper encourages faculty, both individually
and collectively, to examine their teaching and
to incorporate multicultural principles in their
curriculum and classroom environment. It is not
the intent of this paper to suggest that this
integrated approach replace gender and ethnic
studies courses and programs.
Community
College faculty face the challenge of serving
an increasingly diverse student body. This challenge
is further magnified by the changing skills required
for success in the workplace and societal needs.
We recognize that higher education is a critical
component in achieving success in a competitive
global economy. We also understand that it is
the primary way by which people can transcend
their socioeconomic status.
The
complexity of the challenge requires balancing
the institution's mission, resources and capabilities.
Developing a comprehensive multicultural action
plan helps California community colleges to respond
positively to the diversity of this state and
its community colleges. By capitalizing on the
presence of diversity, the faculty can create
a responsive climate for diversity that is essential
for the advancement of California community colleges
and society at large.
The
Academic Senate is guided in its response to diversity
by four sources:
A. The Master Plan of Higher Education.
B. The Board of Governors' adopted "Basic Agenda:
Policy Directions and Priorities for the Nineties",
1992.
C. AB 1725 as is now incorporated into Title 5
of the Education Code.
D. The Student Equity mandate of the Board of
Governors as adopted by theCalifornia Community
College Chancellor's Office.
These
documents reaffirm the mission of California community
colleges and outline a plan to provide Californians,
particularly "those who have been underrepresented
in higher education and the workplace with quality
programs in transfer and career education and
in the mastery of basic skills and English as
a second language." (Board of Governors Basic
Agenda, 1992).
As
California Community Colleges implement their
mission priorities and student equity plans, it
is imperative that they examine their institutional
demographic characteristics.
They must design and implement educational programs
to meet the changing needs of their students and
society. This position paper promotes our nation's
democratic ideals: basic human rights, social
justice, respect for alternate life choices, and
equal opportunity for all (Bennett, 1990).
WHAT
IS DIVERSITY?
If
we are to equip our students for functioning in
the 21st century world where geographic boundaries
no longer define the limits of our interaction
with others, then the definition and our understanding
of diversity must be expanded. Legal definitions
of diversity have been created largely to promote
opportunities for those who have been historically
underrepresented in the workforce. Concepts and
practices such as Equal Opportunity and Affirmative
Action have been developed to address previous
practices that have denied access to employment
for certain groups of individuals. Historically
these have included African-Americans, Asians,
Pacific Islanders, Chicano/Hispanic/Latinos, American
Indians/Native Alaskans and women. These categories
have their limitations, and one should not confuse
these narrow definitions with the need for community
colleges to address diversity in a much broader
sense. In addition to the more traditional gender
and ethnic definitions of diversity, we would
also encourage our colleagues to consider age,
religion, culture, sexual orientation, veteran
status, physical or mental ability or disability,
economic status, language differences and, perhaps
most significantly, individual learning styles.
The
challenge for the classroom teacher faced with
introducing multiculturalism into his or her classroom
is "How can I present my discipline so that ALL
of my students can learn?", rather than "How can
I teach diverse students the intricacies of my
discipline?"
LEARNING
STYLES
Learning
styles may be defined as modes of organizing,
analyzing, classifying, assimilating and synthesizing
information about the environment that are unique
to each individual. How does culture influence
the way individuals learn and how they understand
the world? How does it influence the way they
think, perceive, remember, and solve problems?
Three factors that have been identified and appear
to have an effect on learning styles are:
A. The socialization process, particularly where
a society's child rearing practices fall along
a continuum from authoritative to laissez faire.
B. Sociocultural tightness. The more that established
social structures exert pressure to conform, as
in tight-context cultures, the more responsive
to social reinforcement are its people. An example
of such sociocultural tightness is observed in
a group of students who consistently socialize,
take classes and study together.
C.
The extent of ecological adaptation. In contrast
to our own society, survival in some societies
depends upon the ability to make keen observations
about the environment and having a rich language
to communicate those observations.
Examples
might include accurate reading of the snow conditions
of the Arctic region or wave patterns of the sea
or facial expressions of an oppressor (Freire,
1970).
There
are a number of instruments used by counselors
and instructors to assess student learning styles.
One is included as Appendix B in this document.
Several authors (Armstrong, 1993; Ellis, 1994;
Gardner 1993 and Hoehn, 1989) have described learning
styles and have prepared other instruments. Implementing
a student learning styles approach reemphasizes
the importance of the student in the context of
the discipline. It also underscores the active
role students must play in learning. Once students
recognize their particular learning styles they
are better able to address their learning strengths
and weaknesses and assume a greater level of responsibility
for the learning process.
RECONSTRUCTING
THE CURRICULUM
Curriculum
transformation resulting in the integration of
multiculturalism must address not only what but
how we teach. Transforming the curriculum in both
content and climate is intended to address the
needs of those not traditionally represented in
the academy including women, persons of color
and persons with disabilities. Diversifying the
curriculum is best achieved by employing a variety
of modes. It must be addressed at the individual
college, discipline by discipline, course by course,
instructor by instructor and student by student.
Transformation
of the curriculum occurs along a continuum. Several
authors (Banks, 1993, Green, 1989, Schoem, 1993,
and Ognibene, 1989) have created models that describe
levels of curriculum diversification. These authors
describe, a curricular transformation continuum
that begins at the level of superficial inclusion
of diversity. Superficial inclusion tends to examine
surface cultural contributions such as holidays
or foods, restricts the discussions to a separate
part of the course, or adds limited information
about the contributions of non-western cultures
or women. Curriculum which is truly "multiculturalized"
goes beyond this superficial view. It may present
content that is comparative or that is delivered
so that a non-dominant or comparative cultural
world view serves as the frame of reference. Table
I is provided to describe how a curriculum can
be tailored to meet the needs of our diverse students.
Component
Stage
I
Traditional
Stage
II
Alternative
Stage
III
Integrated
Stage
IV
Futurist
Professional
Development
Traditional
Classes
Seminars
Cross-cultural
team (great teacher model) teaching/learning
Cross-cultural
immersion experience
Subject
Matter
Dominant
Western European perspective
Dominant
Western European perspective with additive
component
content
presented from global perspective
global
perspective, addresses multiple learning methods,
prepares students for change
Instructional
Methods
Lecture
Multiple
methods
student
centered learning experiences
content
presented jointly, use of interactive technology,
service learning, immersion
Evaluation
Methods
Paper
& Pencil
Multiple
methods
self
assessment based on course criteria
individualized
to meet needs of the student and course criteria
How
Learning Takes Place
Instructor
as source of Knowledge
Student/teacher
role reversal
Student/teacher
shared responsibility for learning
students
are equipped with powerful learning tools
and skills and assume greater responsibility
for the learning process
Not
all courses lend themselves readily to incorporating
multicultural content to the same degree. Research
by the instructor can generally provide some content
based material in almost all disciplines. When
course demands limit the amount of time one may
devote to "new" content, the question of developing
a meaningfully integrated curriculum must be addressed.
Given the demands of the discipline, the sequential
nature of courses, or the articulated expectations
that are necessary to complete successive courses,
it may not be possible to fully integrate a multicultural
view in every course in every discipline.
However,
we believe that ALL courses can be adapted to
fit a multicultural climate with very little research
by the instructor. Establishing a classroom environment
that facilitates learning, reflects respect for
all students and demands that respect be displayed
by other students is a first step. Providing an
educational experience that is challenging and
inclusive in a tolerant environment is a goal
that all instructors may achieve. The instructor
who intends to transform his or her classroom
to meet the needs of our diverse students must
examine instructional strategies that address
varied learning styles. Instructors are also encouraged
to provide a comprehensive syllabus that:
A. reflects choices of texts and learning materials
that reflect diversity,
B. recognizes alternatives in learning styles,
C. identifies multiple evaluation measures, and
D. reaches out to students by identifying instructor-
initiated support services such asorganized study groups and review sessions
and refers students to institutional support such
ascounseling or
tutoring services.
CURRICULAR
EXPERIENCES
THAT INCORPORATE A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION
An
anthology for composition courses is selected
because it includes works from a variety of
culturally diverse authors.
Students
are assigned/invited to join study groups
that are composed of students from a variety
of backgrounds. As an assignment, participants
share home cooked foods that are new to other
members.
A
traditional academic discipline (Biology)
is restructured from a strictly lecture/lab
format to include cooperative learning modules.
A
visually impaired student is paired with a
seeing student. In lieu of a regular term
paper assignment, the two students agree to
keep a log of their experience as a "learning
team" and prepare a joint term paper which
includes a section addressing how their team
effort resulted in improved learning for each
student.
At
the first class meeting of the term, each
student is given a learning styles inventory
to help each assess his or her own learning
style. A handout describing each learning
style and a few successful methods of capitalizing
on the strengths of that style is provided.
Some
examinations during the term are given to
a pair or small group of students and the
grade earned by the team is shared. All members
of the team are required to contribute to
the solution of the problems presented in
the exam. Team commitment to successful completion
of the exercise is a valuable learning experience
validating the concept of teamwork and may
be more comfortable for students from cultures
that value and recognize group rather than
individual achievement.
Students
in a cultural anthropology course are required
to research and attend a religious ceremony
or other cultural event from a culture other
than their own. They are encouraged to use
an ethnographic interpreter to identify the
meaning of the experience, take "field notes"
and describe the event as well as their response
to the experience in a brief paper.
As
part of critical thinking/multicultural learning
experience, students are required to do a
brief research report on the contributions
of a non-Euro-American male to the development
of a chemical principle or process. Some common
names keep recurring, of course, but extra
credit is given to researching and reporting
on those whose contributions are new to the
instructor. This provides the instructor with
additional teaching resources and references.
A
learning community has been formed addressing
the theme of "Western Migration in the U.S."
The learning team includes an Historian, an
Anthropologist/American Indian specialist,
an English instructor and a Natural Historian.
The theme is addressed through literature,
film, music and text. It explores the social,
political, economic and ecological relationships
among "Americans," both native and immigrant,
as well as the floral and faunal, during the
19th century. The course culminates in a three
week field trip that includes visits to significant
historical and natural history sites in the
West. Students are required to do group research
projects addressing multiple aspects of the
course and are required to submit a journal
as a part of the course.
CONCLUSION
Infusing
multiculturalism across the curriculum is a formidable
task. There is no one best way or a single answer
to the questions that may face faculty in their
efforts to better serve our students. To begin
implementing a curriculum that is truly multicultural,
one must consider not only the content of the
course, but the climate in which that content
is presented. We believe that the underlying principles
of a multicultural curriculum apply to ALL disciplines
and that efforts to better serve our underrepresented
students will contribute to the success of ALL
of our students as they learn to function in the
multicultural world of the 21st century. By valuing
diversity in ourselves and in others, by demonstrating
positive expectations for our students, by being
willing to learn new things and to try new methods
to facilitate learning, we can help our students
meet the challenges of our changing world. We
ask our colleagues to consider how each may contribute
to this effort as individual teachers and as participants
in the shared governance of their institutions
for it is through change at the individual level
that institutions are moved.
Appendix A
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
This
glossary is provided to inform readers about terms
that are currently used in considering multicultural
issues and attitudes. The list is not intended
to be complete nor are the definitions absolute.
African-American/Afrikan-American:
A person of African heritage born in the
United States. The term became widely used by
the media, academics and community advocates in
the late 1980's, replacing the term black. The
Afrikan spelling is an emerging trend promoting
pride in African heritage and Afrocentrism.
American:
A person born on the American continent.
However the word has generally been associated
with North America and in particular, the United
States.
American
Indian/Native American/Alaskan Native: One
of several designations for an indigenous or native
person of the United States. Persons claiming
membership in this group have typically maintained
cultural identification through tribal affiliation
or community recognition.
Asian-American:
A person of Asian heritage born or living
in the United States. This includes persons from
China, India, Korea, Japan, and Southeast Asian
countries. As a reporting mechanism, this historically
underrepresented group is frequently combined
with Pacific Islanders.
Black:
A term used to designate people with dark
skin with African heritage. In the U.S. it became
popular during the 1960's as a form of self assertion.
It is still used in other parts of the world although
it has generally been replaced in the U.S. by
the term African-American.
Chicano:
This term generally describes people of
Mexican background, born or raised in the United
States. As the Chicano Movement began in the 1960's
it became popular as a form of self assertion
and has gained a broader social and political
connotation.
Color-Blind:
Literally this refers to a person who is
physiologically incapable of distinguishing color.
In social terms it refers to a person who claims
to regard all people, regardless of color, the
same. While seemingly an acceptable practice,
it has gained a negative connotation in that it
ignores differences some people view as positive
and wish to assert.
Cultural
Diversity/Cultural Pluralism: This term
generally encompasses racial, ethnic, regional,
religious, and socioeconomic groups, gender, age,
persons with disabilities and linguistic differences.
The concept of diversity recognizes the individuality
of each of these groups and acknowledges the unique
contributions made by each. Cultural pluralism
suggests a holistic view of society that is more
than the sum of its parts.
Culture:
An integrated pattern of human behavior
including beliefs, thought, action, speech, institutions,
customs and arts that are transmitted to succeeding
generations.
Disability:
A condition which impairs an individual's
ability to function in one or more ways when compared
with the norm. A person may be identified as disabled
if he/she has any condition which affects mobility,
vision (blind), hearing (deaf), speech and language,
learning, brain function due to injury or development
or has an emotional or psychological disorder
that adversely affects educational performance
or has AIDS or is HIV infected. Awareness of the
rights of persons with disabilities increased
in the post Viet Nam era when returning veterans
raised their concerns of being denied access to
the full range society and its benefits. The Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects persons with
disabilities against discrimination in employment
and requires that reasonable accommodations be
made for such persons to function in public places.
Ethnic
Minorities: Native Americans or Alaskan
Natives, Asian-Americans or Pacific Islanders,
African-Americans, or Chicanos/Mexican-Americans/Hispanic/Latinos.
It is generally accepted that a person belongs
to the group which he/she identifies.
Ethnicity:
Affiliation with a group of people classified
according to race or common traits and customs.
This term has been used in place of race to designate
a person's ancestry although race and ethnicity
are not synonymous.
Ethnocentrism:
A perspective expressed consciously or
unconsciously in which one group is viewed as
superior to others. A group that is central to
all other world groups and by which all other
groups are measured. Eurocentrism and Afrocentrism
are two views that place Europe and Africa in
such central positions respectively.
Feminism:
An ideology that developed in the late
1960's that challenges the dominance of the masculine
model as the ideal in society and the marginalization
of women. It advocates for equality and for the
civil, political and human rights of women.
Gay:
A colloquial term for homosexual, that
is, one who is sexually attracted to a person
of the same sex. This term has become popular
as a form of self-identification.
Handicapped:
A term used to describe a person with a
physical or mental disability that increases the
difficulty of normal levels of achievement. It
has generally been replaced by the term disabled.
Handicap describes a barrier or problem created
by society or the environment that impairs a person
to function.
Hispanic:
Literally, this term means a person from
Spain or of Spanish descent. It became widely
used in the 1980's as a term to describe all Spanish-speaking
people. This term has resulted in some controversy
as it suggests a process of assimilation and ethnic
solidarity rather than identification and recognition
of the individual nation of origin. The terms
Chicano, Cubano and Puerto Ricaño are examples
of more specific terms preferred by some.
Historically
Underrepresented Group: In an educational
context, this refers to any group for which the
percentage of persons from that group who enroll
and complete their educational goals is now and
has been, significantly lower than the percentage
that members of that group represent in the adult
population of the State. The Board of Governors
has determined that on a statewide basis this
includes: ethnic minorities, women and persons
with disabilities.
Indian:
The appropriate term to use in describing
a person whose origin is India. The term was misapplied
by early European explorers. More appropriate
terms are available to describe Native Americans.
One practical definition in wide use is that an
American Indian or Native American is one who's
ancestors lived in this country prior to the arrival
of European settlers.
Jew:
Generally referring to a person whose religion
is Judaism. As an ethnic group, Jews are considered
descendants of an ancient Semitic people including
the biblical figures of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Latino/a:
This term generally refers to persons whose
origins are from Latin America who speak Spanish.
Latino is the masculine reference, Latina, the
feminine. This term became widely used in the
1980's as a form of self designation and in opposition
to the term Hispanic which critics contended assigned
too much honor to Spain and its conquest of the
indigenous peoples of the Western hemisphere.
Learning
Styles: Modes of organizing, analyzing,
classifying, assimilating and synthesizing information
about the environment that are unique to each
individual.
Lesbian:
This term specifically refers to female
homosexuals. The term was derived from a reference
to the Greek Island of Lesbos and its famous female
poet, Sappho who described her attraction to women.
This term has come to be popular as a form of
self-identification.
Melting
Pot: A concept popularized in the 1900's
by a popular play, The Melting
Pot, by Israel Zangwill. The play and the
term argues that the U.S. is a great crucible
in which different groups melt together to form
the "American blend." It assumes that the melting
pot is a process of mutual adaptation and groups
blend together on an equal basis. A criticism
of the metaphor is that it ignores historic inequalities,
Eurocentrism, racism and discrimination against
specific groups in society.
Mexican-American:
Persons of Mexican descent born or naturalized
in the United States. The use of this term increased
following World War II as an assertion of incorporation
into mainstream U.S. society.
Minority:
In the literal demographic sense, the term
describes a numeric minority group when compared
with the white, majority group. Demographic trends
in California indicate that within the next decade,
there will be no single majority group in the
state. In a social/political context, minority
generally implies a subordinate group with distinct
physical and cultural characteristics experiencing
differential and unequal treatment. In contrast,
the social/political use of majority suggests
a dominant group with superior rights, privileges
and standing within the community.
Multicultural
Education: A view of education that envisions
and encourages a curriculum reflective of the
society and the world in which we live. It embraces
and accepts the interdependence of the many cultural
and ethnic groups within our society and the world.
It recognizes that individuals do not divest themselves
of their heritage, and values similarities and
differences in all persons.
Native
American: A term used to describe indigenous
people of the U.S. that became popular in the
1980's in place of the term Indian. Persons claiming
membership in this group have typically maintained
cultural identification through tribal affiliation
or community recognition.
Oriental:
Older generations of Asian-Americans and
many still living in Hawaii may still refer to
themselves as Oriental. However, it has become
outdated and has been rejected as a term because
of its imposition by non-Asians.
Pacific
Islanders: A person whose ancestors were
indigenous peoples of the Pacific Islands. This
includes persons from the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii,
Samoa and other Pacific islands.
Persons
with Disabilities: When referring to people
with disabilities, it is appropriate to put the
emphasis on the person rather than the disability,
e.g. "person with a disability" rather than "disabled
person." When in doubt about the appropriate terms
to be used it is acceptable to ask the person
which terms he or she prefers. Common terms in
use include: Blind, referring
to persons who have severe loss of vision. Visually
impaired is also used where vision is not
completely lost.
Persons
whose mobility is restricted and who may
or may not require the assistance of mechanical
devices such as a wheel chair, cane or other device
to assist with mobility.
Deaf
usually refers to persons with a profound
hearing loss. Hearing impaired
may also be used to describe any degree of hearing
loss from slight to profound and is preferable
to "hard of hearing."
Developmental
disability is any mental and/or physical
disorder that began before the age of 22 and continues
indefinitely. This may include persons with mental
retardation, autism, cerebral palsy or other long
term conditions arising from before birth through
adolescence.
Learning disability is
a persistent condition of presumed neurological
disfunction which may exist with other disabling
conditions. This disfunction continues despite
instruction in standard classroom situations.
To be categorized as learning disabled, a student
must exhibit:
a. average to above average intellectual ability
b. severe processing deficit(s)
c. severe aptitude/achievement discrepancy(ies)
d. measured achievement in an instructional or
employment setting.
Mentalillness may describe
many forms of mental illness such as schizophrenia,
depression, bipolar syndrome and emotional disorders.
Again, the emphasis should be placed on the person
rather than the condition; "a person with schizophrenia"
etc.
Physically
Challenged: In an effort to increase awareness
of persons who are differently abled rather than
disabled, this term has emerged to describe persons
whose primary limitation is reduced mobility.
The intent of this change in language is to acknowledge
that a persons's ability to function in society
should be seen as a challenge rather than an impairment.
The reference is considered somewhat trendy, patronizing,
inaccurate and is therefore, offensive to some.
Protected
classes: This term is applied to groups
of historically underrepresented people. Federal
and state definitions differ as follows: Federal
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEOC) guidelines
guarantee non-discrimination and equal employment
opportunity without regard to race, sex, color,
religion, age, marital status, sexual orientation,
disability, ancestry, national origin or other
applicable categories that are legally defined
by laws applicable to the district. Title V defines
protected classes for affirmative action purposes
as women, persons with disabilities and members
of ethnically diverse groups including American
Indian or Alaskan Natives, Asians or Pacific Islanders,
Blacks and Hispanics.
Race:
The concept of race itself is debated among
anthropologists, but has been used historically
and somewhat imprecisely to refer to persons of
the same family, tribe, people, nation or stock,
unified by a community of interests and habits.
Physical characteristics have also been used to
distinguish races and to create an artificial
hierarchy of intellectual capability.
Racism:
The practice of differential treatment
or discrimination against a person based on race
or racial stereotypes. Mechanism of such discrimination
may include overt or covert use of institutional
and ideological mechanisms such as religion, law,
politics, economics, morality, science, fashion
and education. This term is frequently used in
reference to white domination over persons of
color although racism is a practice that may occur
among any group where policy decisions or practices
are based on things such as ethnicity, culture
or skin color.
Sexism:
The practice of differential treatment
or discrimination against a person based on sex
and/or stereotypes of that sex. Mechanism of such
discrimination may include overt or covert use
of institutional and ideological mechanisms such
as religion, law,
politics, economics, morality, science, fashion
and education. This term is frequently used in
reference to male domination over women.
Appendix
B
Perceptual
Learning Style Inventory
Check
those strategies or techniques that you think
help you learn the best.
1. motion pictures 15. slides
2.
lecture, information giving 16. records
3. group discussion 17. questions-and-answer sessions
4. reading assignments 18. independent reading
5. participant in role playing activities 19.
physical motion activities
6. project construction 20. model building
7. odor discrimination 21. scent materials (scratch
and sniff)
8. television programs 22. graphs, tables &
charts
9. audiotapes 23. recitations by others
10. participant in panel discussion 24. interviews
11. written reports 25. writing
12. nonverbal/body movements 26. participant in
physical games
13. drawing, painting or sculpturing 27. touching
objects
14. tasting 28. photographs Perceptual Learning Style
Inventory
Interpretation:
In the first column below, circle the numbers
you checked. If a majority of numbers for a particular
style are circled, you may have a learning style
similar to the one listed in the second column.
Identifying your learning style can help you find
ways to expand your learning effectiveness.
Strategy
NumberLearning
Style
1,
8, 15, 22, 28 Visual
2, 9, 16, 23 Aural
3, 10, 17, 24 Interactive
4, 11, 18, 25 Print
5, 12, 19, 26 Kinesthetic (using body movements)
6, 13, 20, 27 Haptic (using the sense of touch)
7, 14, 21 Olfactory (using the sense of smell) SELECTED REFERENCES
Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 , 42 U.S.C. §12101
et seq.
Armstrong, T. (1993). 7 Kinds
of Smart. New York: Dutton.
Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural
Education: Issues and Perspectives. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Bennett, C.I. (1990). Multicultural
Education: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.)
Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Bensimon, E. M. ed. (1 994). Multicultural
Teaching and Learning. Pennsylvania State
University: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching,
Learning and Assessment.
Board
of Governors (1992). Basic
Agenda. Sacramento, CA: California Community
Colleges Chancellor's Office.
Ellis,
D. (1994). Becoming a Master
Student. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Executive
Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11375.
Freire,
P. (1970). Pedagogy of the
Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
California
Code of Regulations, Title V, §53000- 53064.
California
Education Code §87100.
California
Labor Code §1102.1.
Cook,
L.(1991). Learning Style Awareness and Academic
Achievement Among
Community
College Students. Community/Junior
College Quarterly of Research and Practice 15
(4), 419-425.
Gates, H. L., Jr. (1992). Loose
Canons: Notes on the Culture Wars. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Gardner,
H. (1993). Frames of Mind.-
The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New
York:
Harper Collins.
Green,
M. F. (1989). Minorities on
Campus: A Handbook for Enhancing Diversity. Washington, D.C.: American Council on
Education.
Grosz,
K. S. ed. (1 989). Teaching
and Learning Strategies for Serving Underrepresented
Students: A Collection of Resource Documents.
Santa Monica, CA:Author.
Hoehn,
P., Lilburn, P. & J.E. Sayer (1989). Keys
to College Success. Mt. View, CA:
Mayfield.
Lazear, D. (1 990). Seven Ways
of Knowing: Teaching for Multiple Intelligences.
Palatine, IL: Skylight.
Midlands Technical College (1993). Cultural
Diversity.- Resources and Strategies.
Columbia, S.C.: Author.
Ognibene, E. R. (1 989). Integrating
the Curriculum: From Impossible to Possible. College
Teaching, 37(3), 105-110.
Rothschild, J. and Piland, W. (1993). Intercorrelates
of Learning Style and Personality Characteristics.
Community College Journal of Research and
Practice (1 6)3-189-198.
Schoem, D. , Frankel, L., Zuniga, X., & Lewis,
E.A. Multicultural Teaching
in the University. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Schmitz, B. (1992) Cultural Pluralism and Core
Curricular in M. Adams, ed. Promoting
Diversity in College Classrooms: Innovative Responses
for the Curriculum, Faculty, and Institutions.
Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher
Education (1972). the California
Master Plan for Higher Education the Seventies
and Beyond.- Report and Recommendations. Sacramento,
CA: California Coordinating Council for Higher
Education.
United
States Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI, Title
VII, Title IX.
Villegas,
A. M. (1991). Culturally Responsive
Pedagogy for the 1990's and Beyond. (Trends and Issues Paper, no. 6) Washington,
D.C.: Eric Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
Zita, J. N. (1994). From orthodoxy to pluralism:
A Postsecondary curricular reform. In E.M. Bensimon,
Multicultural Teaching and
Learning. Pennsylvania State University:
National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning
and Assessment.