Local Processes for Faculty Appointments

Fall
2007
Resolution Number
01.02
 
Contact
Assigned to
Educational Policies Committee
Category
Academic Senate
Status
Completed
Summary
Research and disseminate information about the appointment or selection of faculty to short-term, non-teaching tasks; Recommend effective practices for assigning faculty to short-term, non-teaching work that are fair, open, transparent and compliant with Title 5 Regulation 53202.
Status Report

A Rostrum article on the topic was written. It addressed the principles behind good local processes.

Whereas, There are multiple methods by which a faculty member can be assigned to short-term, non-teaching work such as Student Learning Outcomes or accreditation coordinator, or grant director;

Whereas, A recent Academic Senate survey indicated that districts and colleges employ different methods of assigning faculty to these tasks such as appointment by the local academic senates, or by the administration, or by a competitive process; and

Whereas, The handling of these appointments has diversity, equity and fairness implications in the decision-making processes of a college or district;

Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges further research and disseminate information about the appointment or selection of faculty to short-term, non-teaching tasks; and

Resolved, That the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges recommend effective practices for assigning faculty to short-term, non-teaching work that are fair, open, transparent and compliant with Title 5 Regulation 53202. MSC Disposition: Local Senates